What does One Petahash look like?

Bitcoin mining hashrate hit 1 PH today, five weeks earlier than I predicted. Ouch.

As penance, I’m going to visualize one petahash using asicminer hardware as a starting point.


An Asicminer Blade is 10GH, so 1 PH is 100,000 of these.


This is Gen 1 / 110nm hardware, pretty much bottom of the line for asics, which will throw off our scenario by a constant factor. Judging by the hardware specs of


when the bitcoin mining network has everything running on 28nm asics, there could be a 10x increase in KW/GH efficiency. There won’t be much efficiency gains past the 28nm chips for a while, and when the smaller chips finally come the gains will be modest. At any rate, Gen 1 Blades are the only hardware that is shipping today and I’m fairly familiar with this form factor, so starting with that.

What would 100,000 blades  look like racked and stacked? Turn to the top picture, which is a 10 blade subrack, or 100GH. Bigger picture of pretty much the same thing, here:


from http://mineforeman.com/2013/02/08/new-asicminer-rack-pictures/

Subrack looks like about 7Us, and a typical rack is 42Us, so 6 subracks to a rack. 600 GH/rack.

5 to 10 racks is a row. In the schematic below, taken pretty much at random from an energystar infovert, we get 7 racks to a row and 3 rows. You stack rows with the hot ends blowing against each other so you get a cold / hot / cold pattern when you walk around in the computer room.


This room has 3 7-row racks. 21 racks is 12,600 GH. 1.26TH. And at 25 feet per rack, about 500 square feet.

As a side note, another direction to go here with form factors is shipping container. Data center in a shipping container is sexy. But in 2013 it seems pretty pie in the sky. We’ll stick to typical rooms in a data center. Maybe shipping containers another day.

Anyway it is loud in this room, like standing a hundred feet away from a jet engine. All those fans. Loud, and if you don’t have air conditioning, it gets hot. When it gets too hot, your mining rigs start switching off, or if you’re unlucky and don’t have good failsafes they just flat out hardware fail and stop working forever.

Time to think about power and cooling. Blades are 0.007KW/GH but let’s triple that to add some CRAC (Computer Room Air Conditioning). 0.021 KW/GH. 15 KW/rack. About 26 KW in our little room. 

I don’t know whether 26 KW in our room is realistic. Mining is unusual, because all the racks are blasting close to full power all the time.  Maybe you can’t fit that many racks in a room, and keep them cool, with typical data center power arrangements. Maybe the most cost efficient way to scale up your mining operation is to keep the rooms largely empty, while you scout around for high power density with affordable rent. But let’s ignore that for now.

Let’s imagine we are filling up One Wilshire, a famous 30 story data center in Los Angeles. Let’s say there is enough power and cooling, and we are really packing our mining equipment in.


Maybe thirty above-described rooms per story. Not every story is data center — there are lawyers and acountants who rent there too — but ignore that. So, 900 possible rooms, and 30 rooms per story. 37.8 TH/story. 1.1 PH/building.

We have our answer. The bitcoin mining network run on Gen 1 hardware consists of about one One Wilshire-sized data center filled with Blades. Somewhat confirmatory of our ballpark estimate, One Wilshire sold for 437.5 million dollars last month. 

If we had this running on gen 2 hardware, one petahash would be 3 stories and the entire building would be 10 petahashes.

Either way, our building sized mine would consume 21 megawatts of power, with one third for hashing and two thirds for cooling.

And that is what one petahash (or ten petahashes of gen 2) looks like.


About thomashartman1

I am a crypto currency enthusiast, trader, and software developer. Contact: thomas AT standardcrypto DOT com.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to What does One Petahash look like?

  1. Pingback: What does One Petahash look like?

  2. Say what you want about BFL, but they had $1 million worth of orders on Day 1 (in June 2012) and they shipped all of those and then a lot more after that. So you can’t accurately say that “Gen 1 Blades are the only hardware that is shipping today”.

    • Matt says:

      BFL is a joke and deserves everything they get.

      • olhovsky says:

        That’s not relevant to this article. I am not promoting BFL, I am just pointing out that part of “what a petahash looks like” is currently a large amount of BFL equipment.

        How good or bad their company is doesn’t affect that.

    • Jen Wilson says:

      Do you have any evidence that BFL has ever shipping anything other than to reviewers?

      Go away you shill.

      • olhovsky says:

        Wow, I am not promoting BFL in any way.

        This article is about “what a petahash looks like”, and part of that is the millions of dollars worth of BFL equipment that contributes to the current petahash.

        And yes, of course I have concrete evidence that BFL has shipped. Have a look at the bitcointalk marketplace subforum or on bitmit, where users are selling their equipment. BFL has shipped up to their August 26 paydate, last I checked.

    • riflsauce says:

      I can’t order a BFL unit today and get it shipped today. Shipping year+ old pre-orders nine months late does not count. His statement is perfectly accurate.

      • thomashartman1 says:

        According to the Genesis Block mining calculator, they ship with a two month delay.

        “Do you feel lucky today, punk?” 🙂

      • olhovsky says:

        That’s fine, but this article is about “what a petahash looks like”. Part of that petahash is BFL equipment.

  3. AC says:

    You have your power requirements reversed. It would only take 1/3 for cooling not 2/3.

    • thomashartman1 says:

      Can you back that up with a link? I got my estimates talking with a friend that sets up data centers for a living. This is a number I am really interested in having a good estimate on, so please do get back if you have a reference handy.

    • olhovsky says:

      His numbers are right. Cooling 1 watt of power requires the use of about 2 watts of AC power.

  4. bob says:

    You’re missing something.

    Indy racecars go 240 Miles. Wow! Who can imagine what 240 Miles look like. 240 Miles looks like [insert your own description here].

    WHO CARES! 240 Miles is nothing.
    No… it’s significant that Indy cars go 240 Miles PER HOUR.

    One petahash isn’t nearly as impressive as one petahash PER SECOND. It’s a rate! Cmon!

  5. mike says:

    shutup about bfl

  6. Pingback: What does One Petahash look like? | NewsBitcoin.com

  7. Hans Pans says:

    bitmine.ch is releaing 4 PH/s worth of 28 nm ASICs in December. And now, it’s not a full building, just a batch of machines, about 2000 of them at 2 TH/s each

    • thomashartman1 says:

      Sure. 28nm should be about 10x as efficient as 130nm, which is what the blades are.

      2000 machines, if they have form factor similar to blades, would be about two rooms full following the above schema.

      This is the last improvement in terms of space and power that we will see for some years.

      Also given the track record of asic products being released at a promised time, I would allow some buffer.

  8. Pingback: What does one exahash look like? | StandardCrypto

  9. Jon Atkinson says:

    It doesn’t matter whether it’s BFL, the CIA, the Chinese Party, or Auntie Flo and her mates. Thanks for giving us a handle on where it’s/we’re at.

  10. Pingback: John McAfee will own Bitcoin Soon | Bitcoin News and Updates

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s